|
|
ok,
that's crystal clear.
1. can you give me some directions for an online (or otherwise) cop. search?
2. how do i register the copyrights in my project (the most easy ways)?
Marc
"McGyver" <Greyprof@msn.com> schreef in bericht
news:Ac0Bi
|
|
|
hi,
i'm an independent game developer on the pc. my current game
is almost finished, and i will publish it as shareware,
on a commercial basis.
as a programmer i use 'nicks' (nicknames), and i want to
put my current nick in my game credits. the n
|
|
|
Dave Johnson posts his #@($ to divert
attention away from the support the
Damage Control Goons spew in defending
the vile murders, extortions, frauds and
other evils of the Vatican and the Pope.
Have a listen to this audio message:
http://arctic
|
|
|
"Starglider [marc]" <rebel-6-out@planet.nl> wrote in message
news:46d47bbe$0$19307$ba620dc5@text.nova.planet.nl...
> i'm an independent game developer on the pc. my current game
> is almost finished, and i will publish it as shareware,
> on a commerc
|
|
|
Vicegerent" <gerry@mail.samhill.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1188319701.921822.176520@m37g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
> Good article on "word smithing' by Billy-Joe Mauldin of Texas.
> Good article on "word smithing' by Billy-Joe Mauldin of Texas.
>
|
|
|
Abbot) So Warman, since you use your birth name and tell the
government you are a "person" when the need suits you, you are
spiritually dead?
That would explain your heartless and inhuman (read: monstrous)
behavior toward just about everybody in you
|
|
|
Abbot) Eldon, if your theory is true and the government has authority
only over "persons", and not "free willed men" such as you call
yourself, then will you explain how it is that the government of
Canada seems to be exercising its jurisdiction very w
|
|
|
"Vicegerent" <gerry@mail.samhill.co.uk> wrote in message news:1188318904.580876.248400@z24g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
> On Aug 28, 2:06 am, "Amadeus Jinn" <a-j...@here.nu> wrote:
>> "Vicegerent" <ge...@mail.samhill.co.uk> wrote in
>> > Notice the wo
|
|
|
"Vicegerent" <gerry@mail.samhill.co.uk> wrote in message news:
1188341373.9rh.googlegroups.com...
> Good article on "word smithing' by Billy-Joe Mauldin
> of Texas.
>
> The context equally applies to Canada.
>
Are you a PERSON or Not? August 24,
|
|
|
Good article on "word smithing' by Billy-Joe Mauldin
of Texas.
The context equally applies to Canada.
Are you a PERSON or Not? August 24, 2007
that is the PERSON. A man/woman shouldn't
even be in those private tribunal commericial courts!
N
|
|
|
Definition of Human Being
[Received from a friend]
Are you a 'person', an 'individual', or a 'human being'?
These words, at law, define you as being spiritually 'dead.'
This is how the Babylonian/Vatican run world makes its
attachment to you.
In
|
|
|
"Paul Thomas, CPA" <paulthomascpapc@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:v6ZAi.47528$Lu.37748@bignews8.bellsouth.net...
>
> "Amadeus Jinn" <a-jinn@here.nu> wrote
>> I really don't think there is, but you aren't attributing
>> them as they want to be
|
|
|
"Amadeus Jinn" <a-jinn@here.nu> wrote
> I really don't think there is, but you aren't attributing
> them as they want to be attributed.
Sorry, I'll try to genuflect much more properly next time.
Chicago Manual Style (CMS):
genuf
|
|
|
"Amadeus Jinn" <a-jinn@here.nu> wrote
> I know that, but I also know that the dictionary sites
> - own copyright to their entries
> - now publishing the rules of attribution they desire.
And I listed the source.......
no problem.
|
|
|
..
>On Aug 27, 5:23 pm, Vicegerent <ge...@mail.samhill.co.uk> wrote:
> Watch this very informiative video on the history
> of the Vatican's INQUISITION.
> Pope Benedict XVI (Cardinal Ratzinger)
> was the head of the INQUISITION
> (Doctrinal Correc
|
|
|
Abbot) Eldon, if your theory is true and the government has authority
only over persons, and not free willed men such as you call yourself,
then you will need to explain how it is that the government of Canada
seems to be exercising its jurisdiction ve
|
|
|
..
>On Aug 28, 12:49 pm, Vicegerent <ge...@mail.samhill.co.uk> wrote:
> Definition of Human Being
> [Received from a friend]
>
> Are you a 'person', an 'individual', or a 'human being'?
> These words, at law, define you as being spiritually 'dead.
|
|
|
Definition of Human Being
[Received from a friend]
Are you a 'person', an 'individual', or a 'human being'?
These words, at law, define you as being spiritually 'dead.'
This is how the Babylonian/Vatican run world makes its
attachment to you.
In
|
|
|
Good article on "word smithing' by Billy-Joe Mauldin
of Texas.
The context equally applies to Canada.
Are you a PERSON or Not? August 24, 2007
that is the PERSON. A man/woman shouldn't
even be in those private tribunal commericial courts!
N
|
|
|
Abbot) Warman, using the same old logical fallacy of the undistributed
middle (http://www.fallacyfiles.org/undismid.html) you tell us that
natural persons are not "as God made them" (see Blackstone) but really
monsters.
Piecing together bits of arca
|
|
|
Watch this very informiative video on the history
of the Vatican's INQUISITION.
Pope Benedict XVI (Cardinal Ratzinger)
was the head of the INQUISITION
(Doctrinal Correctness) before becoming Pope.
http://arcticbeacon.com/movies/catholic_inquisition
|
|
|
Abbot) Eldon, if your theory is true and the government has authority
only over persons, and not free willed men such as you call yourself,
then you will need to explain how it is that the government of Canada
seems to be exercising its jurisdiction ve
|
|
|
..
> On Aug 28, 12:40 pm, Vicegerent <ge...@mail.samhill.co.uk> wrote:
> Good article on "word smithing' by Billy-Joe Mauldin
> of Texas.
>
> The context equally applies to Canada.
>
> Are you a PERSON or Not? August 24, 2007
>
> that is the P
|
|
|
Definition of Human Being
[Received from a friend]
Are you a 'person', an 'individual', or a 'human being'?
These words, at law, define you as being spiritually 'dead.'
This is how the Babylonian/Vatican run world makes its
attachment to you.
In
|
|
|
Good article on "word smithing' by Billy-Joe Mauldin
of Texas.
The context equally applies to Canada.
Are you a PERSON or Not? August 24, 2007
that is the PERSON. A man/woman shouldn't
even be in those private tribunal commericial courts!
N
|
|
|
On Aug 28, 2:06 am, "Amadeus Jinn" <a-j...@here.nu> wrote:
> "Vicegerent" <ge...@mail.samhill.co.uk> wrote in
> > Notice the word "man" or "woman" are not anywhere to be
> > found in those copyrighted statutes either.
>
> Are statutes copyrighted? R
|
|
|
..
> On Aug 28, 12:14 pm, Vicegerent <ge...@mail.samhill.co.uk> wrote:
> Definition of Human Being
> [Received from a friend]
>
> Are you a 'person', an 'individual', or a 'human being'?
> These words, at law, define you as being spiritually 'dead
|
|
|
Definition of Human Being
[Received from a friend]
Are you a 'person', an 'individual', or a 'human being'?
These words, at law, define you as being spiritually 'dead.'
This is how the Babylonian/Vatican run world makes its
attachment to you.
In
|
|
|
"Paul Thomas, CPA" <paulthomascpapc@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:YFWAi.67399$pu2.46145@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
>
> "Amadeus Jinn" <a-jinn@here.nu> wrote
>> I know that, but I also know that the dictionary sites
>> - own copyright to thei
|
|
|
Abbot) Eldon, if your theory is true and the government has authority
only over persons, and not free willed men such as you call yourself,
then you will need to explain how it is that the government of Canada
seems to be exercising its jurisdiction ve
|
|
|
Abbot) Earlier you said humans were blacks because the "hu" in human
meant color or hue. When it turned out the Latin root for human didn't
back you up you ran off to hide under your bed.
Now that you've been asked to explain your tortured explanatio
|
|
|
"Amadeus Jinn" <a-jinn@here.nu> wrote
> FWIW, clearly you are correct. Words mean what
> people think they mean. (...and you probably
> just infringed Dictionary.com's copyrighted entry.
> ...but since you made no money on a Usenet post...
> But i
|
|
|
Definition of Human Being
[Received from a friend]
Are you a 'person', an 'individual', or a 'human being'?
These words, at law, define you as being spiritually 'dead.'
This is how the Babylonian/Vatican run world makes its
attachment to you.
In
|
|
|
"Paul Thomas, CPA" <paulthomascpapc@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:CzUAi.25673$mp6.16383@bignews9.bellsouth.net...
>
> "Amadeus Jinn" <a-jinn@here.nu> wrote
>> FWIW, clearly you are correct. Words mean what
>> people think they mean. (...and
|
|
|
Abbot) Eldon, if your theory is true and the government has authority
only over persons, and not free willed men such as you call yourself,
then you will need to explain how it is that the government of Canada
seems to be exercising its jurisdiction ve
|
|
|
"Paul Thomas, CPA" <paulthomascpapc@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:kEEAi.71554$jH3.63876@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
> Eldon Warman wrote
>> Notice the word "man" or "woman" are not anywhere
>> to be found in those copyrighted statutes either.
>
|
|
|
"Vicegerent" <gerry@mail.samhill.co.uk> wrote in message news:1188229343.103170.315430@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> Good article on "word smithing' by Billy-Joe Mauldin
> of Texas.
>
> The context equally applies to Canada.
>
> Are you a PERSO
|
|
|
"Paul Thomas, CPA" <paulthomascpapc@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:BUAAi.23673$mp6.7842@bignews9.bellsouth.net...
> Eldon Warman wrote
>
> I think we've found Eldon's latest trigger. He got caught running his vehicle (whatever that may be) u
|
|
|
In article <hdq0b3hlga1g6dqjn19nfusa28lkkc9jj7@4ax.com>,
Bob <bob23@soc.eert.edu> wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:58:32 -0700, Vicegerent <gerry@mail.samhill.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
> \On Jul 18, 2:49 pm, "Paul Thomas, CPA" <paulthomascp...@bellsouth.n
|
|
