|
Recent research here in Canada shows that the income tax
is imposed based upon the 'property right', and that property
right is the property right of the corporate Crown in Canada, and
corporate State (be it a State or the UNITED STATES) in the USA.
All adult humans are deceived into using the fiction name, as
imprinted
on the copy of the birth certificate you receive when ordering it from
Provincial/State Vital Statistics, or to whatever source you apply.
It is with the family name made a primary, or surname, (Mister Jones),
and the given names of the child (Peter) made a reference name to the
primary name. This is the reverse or mirror image to reality.
We are then 'forced' or 'obliged' to use that name in all commercial
and Government dealings and communications. So, when we do use it,
as 99.99% of the human inhabitants of North America do, we supposedly
'voluntarily' attach ourselves, the free will adult human, to the
Crown/State owned property, called the 'legal identity name'.
The Crown/State then invokes the legal maxim, accessio cedit
principali,
[an accessory attached to a principal becomes the property of the
owner
of the principal], where the principal is the legal identity name as
'intellectual property', the owner is the corporation called the
Crown/
State or UNITED STATES, and the accessory is the free will human who
has supposedly volunteered himself to be 'property by attachment' of
the
Crown/State. An adult human who is property is, and by any other
name,
a 'slave', be it citizen, subject or freeman.
As a slave, one's property in possession, including body and labor,
belongs to the slave owner 100%. And, the property right is a bundle
of rights - own, use, sell, gift, bequeath and hypothicate property.
Thus, ALL 'income' resulting from the owned human slave's mental
and/or physical labor belongs to the slave owner. That which is left
with
or granted to the slave for his own use and maintenance is called a
'benefit'.
In Canada, the 'return of income' [the phrase itself tells the story]
is
called a T1 'tax and benefits package'. The T1 or 1040 is an
accounting
by the slave of his fruits of labor that belongs to the slave owner,
and
the prescribed 'benefits' that he may keep or have back from
withholding.
Thus, all income tax cases', in reality, result from fraud, illegal
concealment and theft by the slave of the 'slave owner's property'.
Going back to an above paragraph, we find that the attachment of
oneself
to the Crown/State owned name is 'assumed to be voluntary', as the
Crown/State has no 'claim of right' to the contrary. And
constitutional
prohibitions of slavey only encompases 'involuntary servitude', not
'voluntary
servitude'. Anyone working as an employee is in a contract of
voluntary
servitude - direction and time control by, and obedience and loyalty
to
the employer.
A POSSIBLE REMEDY
However, since we are 'forced to', or 'obliged to' use the Crown/
State
owned legal identity name in all commercial and government dealings,
services and communications, we can make a 'claim of right' under the
Rule of Private Necessity.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Necessity_(tort)
This should counter the claim that we 'voluntarily' attach ourselves
to Crown/State property. The Private necessity, of course, is that
we cannot do anything in relation to life, liberty, property or due
process of law wothout using the Crown/State owned name, and
thus we cannot sustain or maintain our lives without that fiction
name.
A process that has worked recently in Texas is the 'surrender' of the
copy of the birth certificate one has in possession to a judge, or
the
judge assigned to a case where you, in the legal identity name, are
the defendant, in an 'in chambers' hearing. Some call this 'surrender'
of the defendant (the legal identity name) as being on the 'private
side' using the Biblical method of settling disputes privately if
possible.
This is preferred to 'surrendering it in court' as that is on the
'public
side', and as a human presence in the court room, the assumption
that you are an attachment to the legal identity name has already
been made.And being attached as an accessory to it, you become
surety, guarantor and do 'represent' the legal identity name
defendant.
Vicegerent
http://www.detaxcanada.org
The Home of the $0.00 Tax Owing method of filing a T1 or IRS 1040
|
| |
| |
gerry@mail2libertarian.com wrote:
Recent research here in Canada shows that the income tax
is imposed based upon the 'property right', and that property
right is the property right of the corporate Crown in Canada, and
corporate State (be it a State or the UNITED STATES) in the USA.
YAWN
Post the proof that any of your "methods" work.
--
PV
|
| |
| |
On Apr 25, 1:18 pm, "PV" <edru...@NOSPAMtelus.net> wrote:
ge...@mail2libertarian.com wrote:
YAWN
Post the proof that any of your "methods" work.
--
PV
Post the PROOF that it doesn't work.
Vicegerent
|
| |
| |
Recent research here in Canada shows that the income tax
is imposed based upon the 'property right', and that property
right is the property right of the corporate Crown in Canada, and
corporate State (be it a State or the UNITED STATES) in the USA.
All adult humans are deceived into using the fiction name, as
imprinted on the copy of the birth certificate you receive when
ordering
it from Provincial/State Vital Statistics, or to whatever source you
apply.
It is with the family name made a primary, or surname, (Mister Jones),
and the given names of the child (Peter) made a reference name to the
primary name. This is the reverse or mirror image to reality.
We are then 'forced' or 'obliged' to use that name in all commercial
and Government dealings and communications. So, when we do use it,
as 99.99% of the human inhabitants of North America do, we
supposedly 'voluntarily' attach ourselves, the free will adult human,
to the Crown/State owned property, called the 'legal identity name'.
The Crown/State then invokes the legal maxim, accessio cedit
principali, [an accessory attached to a principal becomes the
property of the owner of the principal], where the principal is
the legal identity name as 'intellectual property', the owner is
the corporation called the Crown/State or UNITED STATES,
and the accessory is the free will human who has supposedly
volunteered himself to be 'property by attachment' of the
Crown/State. An adult human who is property is, and by
any other name, a 'slave', be it citizen, subject or freeman.
As a slave, one's property in possession, including body and
labor, belongs to the slave owner 100%. And, the property right
is a bundle of rights - own, use, sell, gift, bequeath and
hypothicate property.
Thus, ALL 'income' resulting from the owned human slave's
mental and/or physical labor belongs to the slave owner.
That which is left with or granted to the slave for his own use
and maintenance is called a 'benefit'. In Canada, the 'return
of income' [the phrase itself tells the story] is called a T1
'tax and benefits package'.
The T1 or 1040 is an accounting by the slave of his fruits of
labor that belongs to the slave owner, and the prescribed
'benefits' that he may keep or have back from withholding.
Thus, all income tax cases', in reality, result from fraud, illegal
concealment and theft by the slave of the 'slave owner's property'.
Going back to an above paragraph, we find that the attachment
of oneself to the Crown/State owned name is 'assumed to be
voluntary', as the Crown/State has no 'claim of right' to the
contrary. And constitutional prohibitions of slavey only encompases '
involuntary servitude', not 'voluntary servitude'. Anyone working
as an employee is in a contract of voluntary servitude - direction
and time control by, and obedience and loyalty to the employer.
A POSSIBLE REMEDY
However, since we are 'forced to', or 'obliged to' use the Crown/
State owned legal identity name in all commercial and
government dealings, services and communications, we can
make a 'claim of right' under the Rule of Private Necessity.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Necessity_(tort)
This should counter the claim that we 'voluntarily' attach ourselves
to Crown/State property. The Private necessity, of course, is that
we cannot do anything in relation to life, liberty, property or due
process of law wothout using the Crown/State owned name, and
thus we cannot sustain or maintain our lives without that fiction
name.
A process that has worked recently in Texas is the 'surrender' of the
copy of the birth certificate one has in possession to a judge, or
the judge assigned to a case where you, in the legal identity name,
are the defendant, in an 'in chambers' hearing. Some call this
'surrender' of the defendant (the legal identity name) as being
on the 'private side' using the Biblical method of settling disputes
privately if possible.
This is preferred to 'surrendering it in court' as that is on the
'public side', and as a human presence in the court room, the
assumption that you are an attachment to the legal identity
name has already been made.And being attached as an
accessory to it, you become surety, guarantor and do
'represent' the legal identity name defendant.
Vicegerent
http://www.detaxcanada.org
The Home of the $0.00 Tax Owing method of filing a T1 or IRS 1040
|
| |
| |
Recent research here in Canada shows that the income tax
is imposed based upon the 'property right', and that property
right is the property right of the corporate Crown in Canada, and
corporate State (be it a State or the UNITED STATES) in the USA.
All adult humans are deceived into using the fiction name, as
imprinted on the copy of the birth certificate you receive when
ordering
it from Provincial/State Vital Statistics, or to whatever source you
apply.
It is with the family name made a primary, or surname, (Mister Jones),
and the given names of the child (Peter) made a reference name to the
primary name. This is the reverse or mirror image to reality.
We are then 'forced' or 'obliged' to use that name in all commercial
and Government dealings and communications. So, when we do use it,
as 99.99% of the human inhabitants of North America do, we
supposedly 'voluntarily' attach ourselves, the free will adult human,
to the Crown/State owned property, called the 'legal identity name'.
The Crown/State then invokes the legal maxim, accessio cedit
principali, [an accessory attached to a principal becomes the
property of the owner of the principal], where the principal is
the legal identity name as 'intellectual property', the owner is
the corporation called the Crown/State or UNITED STATES,
and the accessory is the free will human who has supposedly
volunteered himself to be 'property by attachment' of the
Crown/State. An adult human who is property is, and by
any other name, a 'slave', be it citizen, subject or freeman.
As a slave, one's property in possession, including body and
labor, belongs to the slave owner 100%. And, the property right
is a bundle of rights - own, use, sell, gift, bequeath and
hypothicate property.
Thus, ALL 'income' resulting from the owned human slave's
mental and/or physical labor belongs to the slave owner.
That which is left with or granted to the slave for his own use
and maintenance is called a 'benefit'. In Canada, the 'return
of income' [the phrase itself tells the story] is called a T1
'tax and benefits package'.
The T1 or 1040 is an accounting by the slave of his fruits of
labor that belongs to the slave owner, and the prescribed
'benefits' that he may keep or have back from withholding.
Thus, all income tax cases', in reality, result from fraud, illegal
concealment and theft by the slave of the 'slave owner's property'.
Going back to an above paragraph, we find that the attachment
of oneself to the Crown/State owned name is 'assumed to be
voluntary', as the Crown/State has no 'claim of right' to the
contrary. And constitutional prohibitions of slavey only encompases '
involuntary servitude', not 'voluntary servitude'. Anyone working
as an employee is in a contract of voluntary servitude - direction
and time control by, and obedience and loyalty to the employer.
A POSSIBLE REMEDY
However, since we are 'forced to', or 'obliged to' use the Crown/
State owned legal identity name in all commercial and
government dealings, services and communications, we can
make a 'claim of right' under the Rule of Private Necessity.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Necessity_(tort)
This should counter the claim that we 'voluntarily' attach ourselves
to Crown/State property. The Private necessity, of course, is that
we cannot do anything in relation to life, liberty, property or due
process of law wothout using the Crown/State owned name, and
thus we cannot sustain or maintain our lives without that fiction
name.
A process that has worked recently in Texas is the 'surrender' of the
copy of the birth certificate one has in possession to a judge, or
the judge assigned to a case where you, in the legal identity name,
are the defendant, in an 'in chambers' hearing. Some call this
'surrender' of the defendant (the legal identity name) as being
on the 'private side' using the Biblical method of settling disputes
privately if possible.
This is preferred to 'surrendering it in court' as that is on the
'public side', and as a human presence in the court room, the
assumption that you are an attachment to the legal identity
name has already been made.And being attached as an
accessory to it, you become surety, guarantor and do
'represent' the legal identity name defendant.
Vicegerent
http://www.detaxcanada.org
The Home of the $0.00 Tax Owing method of filing a T1 or IRS 1040
|
| |
| |
gerry@mail2libertarian.com wrote:
On Apr 25, 1:18 pm, "PV" <edru...@NOSPAMtelus.net> wrote:
Post the PROOF that it doesn't work.
Vicegerent
It's been posted too many times Eldon, in the meantime you have never posted
anything that proves it does. The only thing a hapless user will get is a
date in front of a judge
--
PV
|
| |
| |
On Apr 25, 4:44 pm, "PV" <edru...@NOSPAMtelus.net> wrote:
ge...@mail2libertarian.com wrote:
It's been posted too many times Eldon, in the meantime you have never posted
anything that proves it does. The only thing a hapless user will get is a
date in front of a judge
--
PV
And, judges have you cowed, eh PV?
They must be the boogey man you look for under your bed,
Vicegerent
|
| |
| |
|
